TY  - BOOK
AU  - Krishna,Sankaran
TI  - Postcolonial insecurities: India, Sri Lanka, and the question of nationhood 
T2  - Borderlines
SN  - 0816633290
AV  - DS489.84 .K77 1999
U1  - 954.93032 KRI 23
PY  - 1999///
CY  - Minneapolis, MN
PB  - University of Minnesota Press
KW  - Tamil (Indic people)
KW  - Sri Lanka
KW  - Politics and government
KW  - 1978-
KW  - India
KW  - Foreign relations
N1  - Includes bibliographical references (p. 289-307) and index; Acknowledgments; List of Abbreviations; Introduction; PART I: Narratives in Contention: Indian, Sinhalese, and Tamil Nationalisms; 1. Mimetic Histories: Foreign Policy and the Narration of India; 2. Producing Sri Lanka from Ceylon: J.R. Jayewardene and Sinhala Identity; 3. Essentially Tamil: The Divergent Narratives of Eelam and Dravidinadu; PART II: Delusions of Grandeur: India, Tamil Nadu, and Sri Lanka; 4. Modulating Bangladesh: India and Sri Lanka, 1980-84; 5. Hegemony as Spectacle: The Theater of Postcolonial Politics
N2  - Annotation $bThis ambitious work explores the vexed connections among nation-building, ethnic identity, and regional conflict by focusing on a specific event: Indian political and military intervention in the ethnic conflict between the sinhalese and Tamils in Sri Lanka. Drawing on interviews with leading players in the Indian-Sri Lankan debacle, Sankaran Krishna offers a persuasive analysis of this episode. The intervention serves as a springboard to a broader inquiry into the interworking of nation-building, ethnicity, and "foreign" policy. Krishna argues that the modernist effort to construct nation-states on the basis of singular notions of sovereignty and identity has reached a violent dead end in the postcolonial world of South Asia. Showing how the nationalist agenda that seeks to align territory with identity has unleashed a spiral of regional, statist, and insurgent violence, he makes an eloquent case for reimagining South Asia along post-national lines -- as a "confederal" space. Postcolonial Insecurities counters the perception of "ethnicity" as an inferior and subversive principle compared with the progressive ideal of the "nation." Krishna, in fact shows ethnicity to be indispensable to the production and reproduction of the nation itself
ER  -