000 02603 a2200289 4500
003 OSt
005 20170301115029.0
008 170301b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
020 _a9780199468966 (hbk.)
_cRs. 895
040 _aBLR
_erda
082 0 4 _223
_a320.8 SIN
_b009911
100 1 0 _aSingh, Satyajit
_eauthor.
245 1 _aThe local in governance:
_bpolitics, decentralization, and environment /
_cSatyajit Singh.
250 _aFirst edition.
264 1 _aNew Delhi:
_bOxford University Press,
_c2016.
300 _axiv, 261 pages. :
_billustrations. ;
_c22 cm.
336 _2rdacontent
_atext
337 _2rdamedia
_aunmediated
338 _2rdacarrier
_avolume
505 _aMachine generated contents note: 1.The Local in Governance: Politics and Institutions for Sustainable Development 2.Conflict Resolution, Decentralization, and Recentralization: Village Forest Councils in Uttarakhand 3.Collective Dilemmas and Collective Pursuits: Community Management of the Van Panchayats 4.Diverse Property Rights and Forest Management: Institutions and Politics in Uttarakhand 5.Joint Forest Management: Decentralization, Recentralization, and Devolutionary Intent 6.`Public' in Rural Water Supply: Decentralization as Reforms 7.Decentralizing Rural Drinking Water: The Political Economy of Institutional Reforms Conclusion: Political Power -Inclusive Democracy and Capacity Development.
520 _aThis study examines the political economy of how institutional designs for governance are created, and the role of local politics in shaping institutions. While some recent approaches to governance and decentralization are normative, economistic, and technocratic, 'The Local in Governance' underlines the importance of the political. It studies the different architectures of decentralization, based on multiple ideas and values on the ground. The idea of the political in decentralization establishes that unlike uniform normative outcomes, diverse local institutions lead to different outcomes as they interface with micro politics of various hues. Drawing empirical evidence from the forestry and water sectors in India, the author concludes that it is in the creation of decentralized institutions, and in the political economy of their functioning, that outcome paths of decentralization- democratic, devolutionary, and accountable (the good)- or the new forms of recentralization and deconcentration (the not so good), are determined.
650 0 _aLocal Governance.
650 0 _aDecentralization.
650 0 _aGovernance.
650 0 _aPolitics.
942 _2ddc
_cBK
999 _c9631
_d9631